ABSTRACT
Twice each
day, thanks to a gravitational pull on earth from our rotating moon, the
world's oceans produce powerful water currents and rising and falling tides.
Humans have studied and exploited the tremendous power of the tides for
millennia, including harnessing tidal power in 10th century dams to
turn millwheels for grinding flour. Forty years ago, the first tidal dams were
constructed to convert tidal power into electricity. One of the first such
tidal dams was constructed on Canada’s
Bay of Fundy, where tides rise by as much as
12 meters (45 feet). Now, new energy technologies (NOT dams) that generate
electricity from tidal currents could help produce as much electricity as the
largest hydroelectric dams or nuclear and fossil fuel generating stations,
without producing greenhouse gases or harming the environment. This paper
focuses on need of renewable energy sources, tidal power superiority over other
types of renewable energy sources. Paper also gives brief information of
construction, basic components& types of tidal power plants.Information
regarding turbines used in tidal plants are also given. Advantages&
disadvantages of tidal power plant is also discussed. The paper also includes
case study of La-Rance in France
is given for more information regarding this important power source.
INTRODUCTION
Creating
power using water flow is not a new idea. A Frenchman known only as Monsieur
Girard filed the first-ever patent for a wave energy device on July 12, 1799. He thought
that if someone used the “motion and successive inequality of waves, which
after having been elevated like mountains fall away in the following instant. .
One has conceived the idea of the most overfull machine which has ever existed”
(Ross 1991). This simple yet inventive idea has changed drastically since its
introduction. Today, hydroelectric power, or energy produced by water, is used
in various forms ranging from dams to tidal generation.
The
sources for 90% of the electric energy generated today are non- renewable
(Edinger 2000). Renewable sources of energy are necessary because the Earth
will eventually run out of the resources to create non-renewable energy. There
are three types of renewable energy sources: solar, wind, and waterpower. Both
solar and wind power are drastically affected by weather variations, while
tidal power varies little when the weather changes. Seawater is 832 times as
dense as air; therefore the kinetic energy available from a 5-knot ocean current is equivalent to a wind velocity of 270 km/m (Blue
Energy Canada 2000). Thus, tidal power generation may be the most viable of the
three types of renewable sources of energy.
Tides, the
daily rise and fall of ocean levels relative to coastlines, are a result of the
gravitational force of the moon, the gravitational force of the sun, and the
revolution of the Earth. The tides produce the electricity for tidal power by
flowing in and out of turbines. A hydrostatic head or adequate water height
difference on either side of the turbine is all that is necessary to run the
turbine, and the turbines turn an electric generator that produces electricity.
The simple idea of utilizing hydrostatic head to power turbines will be the
crux of our article.
Chart
illustrating the comparative energy advantage of Blue Energy’s Vertical-axis
tidal current turbine system over other renewable energy options. (Courtesy,
Blue Energy Canada)
BASIC
PRINCIPLES OF TIDES
Gravitational
Effects and the Centrifugal Force:-The interaction of the Moon and the Earth
results in the oceans bulging out towards the Moon, whilst on the opposite side
the gravitational effect is partly shielded by the Earth resulting in a
slightly smaller interaction and the oceans on that side bulge out away from
the Moon, due to centrifugal forces. This is known as the Lunar Tide. This is
complicated by the gravitational interaction of the Sun which results in the
same effect of bulging towards and away from the Sun on facing and opposing
sides of the Earth. This is known as the Solar Tide. As the Sun and Moon are
not in fixed positions in the celestial sphere, but change position with
respect to each other, their influence on the tidal range (difference between
low and high tide) is also affected. For example, when the Moon and the Sun are
in the same plane as the Earth, the tidal range is the superposition of the
range due to the lunar and solar tides. This results in the maximum tidal range
(spring tides).Alternatively when they are at right angles to each other; lower
tidal differences are experienced resulting in neap tides. Tidal basics
1. Most
locations have two tidal cycles per day: 12 hours, 25 minutes
2. Essentially
caused by interaction of moon, earth, and sun centrifugal forces
3. Diurnal
tides are generated because the maxima and minima in each daily rotation are
unequal in amplitude
Fig.1 Generation of Tides’
TYPE OF TIDAL POWER PLANTS
•
First-generation, barrage-style tidal power plants
The oldest
technology to harness tidal power for the generation of electricity involves
building a dam, known as a barrage, across a bay or estuary that has large
differences in elevation between high and low tides. Water retained behind a
dam at high tide generates a power head sufficient to generate electricity as
the tide ebbs and water released from within the dam turns conventional
turbines. Though the American and Canadian governments considered constructing
ocean dams to harness the power of the Atlantic tides in the 1930s, the first
commercial scale tidal generating barrage rated at 240 MW was built in La
Rance.
•
Second-generation, tidal current power production
Engineers
have recently created two new kinds of devices to harness the energy of tidal
currents (AKA ‘tidal streams’) and generate renewable, pollution-free
Electricity.
These new devices may be distinguished as Vertical-axis and Horizontal axis
models, determined by the orientation of a sub sea, rotating shaft that turns a
gearbox linked to a turbine with the help of large, slow-moving rotor blades.
Both models can be considered a kind of underwater windmill. While
horizontal-axis turbine prototypes are now being tested in northern Europe (the UK and Norway) a vertical-axis turbine has
already been successfully tested in Canada. Tidal current
Energy systems
have been endorsed by leading environmental organizations, including
Greenpeace, the Sierra Club of British Columbia and the David Suzuki Foundation
as having “the lightest of environmental footprints,” compared to other large-scale
energy system.
TYPE 1ST: BARRAGE TYPE TIDAL
POWER PLANT
CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS BASIC COMPONENTS:
The four
main components of a tidal power generation plant will be subsequently
discussed. These components (as shown in Figure 2) are a tidal basin, a tidal barrage, sluice
gates, and the tidal turbines
themselves.
The first
component of a tidal power generation plant is a tidal basin, or estuary.
Finding a proper site containing an estuary is essential for the successful
operation of a tidal power generation plant. One must note that the estuary
will not be man-made; rather, the tidal basin will be a geographical feature
that is not easily
Figure 2: Ebb generating system with a
bulb turbine
replicated. A suitable estuary is typically a large
body of water that is almost entirely surrounded by land with a small opening
to the sea. The amount of power that a tidal power generation plant can produce
is proportional to the size of the estuary (Taylor 1982).
The second
component of a tidal power generation plant is the tidal barrage. This barrage
looks like a wall that cuts off the estuary from the remainder of the sea. The
bottom of the barrage sits on the sea floor, and the top of the barrage sits
above the highest level that seawater can reach at high tide (Edinger 2000).
The tidal barrage serves the purpose of cutting off seawater from water in the
estuary so that water can be channeled through the wall in a beneficial manner
for tidal power to be created.
The third component of tidal power generating
plants is sluice gates. Basically defined, sluice gates are areas of the
barrage where water can freely flow in and out of the estuary. These gates are
not always open: rather, they are controlled by the power plant operators such
that water flows in and out of the estuary in a favorable method to the tidal
turbines. Sluice gates do not have a uniform location on the tidal barrage.
The fourth major component of tidal power
generation plants is the tidal turbines themselves. These turbines are located
within the tidal barrage, and sit near the bottom of the sea floor. The
turbines are designed in the same manner as a steam turbine. The turbines lie
between sluice gates located on both the estuary and seaside of the tidal
barrage. When these gates are opened, water rushes through the turbines,
spinning the blades and creating electricity.
SINGLE EFFECT &DOUBLE EFFECT POWER GENERATION
There are
two unique designs for tidal power generation plants. The first is single
effect, which is also referred to as ebb generating flow. The second, more
complex, design is termed double effect and will be discussed after single
effect is understood. Single effect tidal power generation plants create power
from water flowing through turbines in only one direction (Ross 1995). In the
same way that steam turbines cannot operate if steam flows through in the
opposite direction, single effect turbines cannot function unless water is run
through them in a uniform direction. The tidal cycle of single effect operation
is discussed below. Assume that water in the estuary is low and high tide conditions
exist outside of the estuary
Figure 3: The tidal cycle for single effect turbines (Newsome
2002).
When the water level in the sea is
sufficiently high, sluice gates located away from the tidal turbines are opened
and water rushes into the estuary, eventually filling the tidal basin to the
level of the sea. When the water level inside the estuary reaches the water
level of the sea, the sluice gates are closed and the high water sits inside of
the estuary. While the water level inside of the estuary stays constant, the
water level in the sea goes down and low tide conditions are ultimately
reached. When the sea water level is suitably low, sluice gates located in
front of and behind the turbines are opened. By opening these sluice gates,
water is forced to flow through the turbine, spinning the blades and creating
electricity. The sluice gates are closed when the estuary water level reaches
the low tide water level of the sea. The water level in the sea rises back to
high tide, and the cycle starts over again (Banal 1981).
The tidal
cycle of double effect turbines (see Figure 4) is shown below. The cycle begins
as the single effect cycle does, with the water level in the estuary low nd the
water level in the sea at high tide conditions. Sluice gates in front of and
behind the turbines are opened so that water rushes through the turbines,
creating electricity. When the water level inside the estuary gets to the same
level as the sea water level, the sluice gates are closed. The water in the
estuary stays high, and the water in the sea will finally reach low tide
conditions. When the water level in the sea is low enough, the same sluice
gates in front of and behind the turbine are reopened and water flows out of
the estuary through the turbines (Banal 1981).
Figure 4: The tidal
cycle for double effect turbines.
Turbines
that generate electricity when water flows over the blades in two directions
are the largest innovation in tidal power technology. The blades are designed
such that they spin in the same direction regardless of the direction that
water flows over them. Allowing the blades to spin due to multi-directional
flow allows double effect turbines to have a greater power output than
comparable single effect turbines. Intuition tells people that double effect
turbines should create about twice as much power as single effect turbines.
Double effect turbines do produce more power than comparable single effect
turbines: however, double effect turbines do not produce twice the amount of
power that single effect turbines create (Ross 1991).
TURBINES USED IN TIDAL POWER STATION
Tidal Turbines:
Several
different turbine configurations are possible. For example, the La Rance tidal plant near St Malo on the Brittany coast in France uses a bulb turbine (figure
5). In systems with a bulb turbine, water flows around the turbine, making
access for maintenance difficult, as the water must be prevented from flowing
past the turbine. Rim turbines (figure 6), such as the Straflo turbine used at Annapolis Royal in Nova
Scotia, reduce these problems as the generator is
mounted in the barrage, at right angles to the turbine blades. Unfortunately,
it is difficult to regulate the performance of these turbines and it is
unsuitable for use in pumping. Tubular turbines have been proposed for use in
the Severn tidal project in the United Kingdom.
In this
configuration, the blades are connected to a long shaft and orientated at an
angle so that the generator is sitting on top of the barrage.
Fig.5 Bulb Turbine (Copyright Boyle, 1996)
Fig.6 Rim Turbine (Copyright Boyle,
1996)
Details of Bulb turbine:
The Bulb
turbine is a reaction turbine of Kaplan type which is used for the lowest
heads. It is characterized by having the essential turbine components as well
as the generator inside a bulb, from which the name is developed. A main
difference from the Kaplan turbine is fore over that the water flows with a
mixed axial-radial direction into the guide vane cascade and not through a
scroll casing. The guide vane spindles are inclined (normally 60o) in relation
to the turbine shaft. Contrary to other turbine types this results in a conical
guide vane cascade. The Bulb turbine runner is of the same design as for the
Kaplan turbine, and it may also have different numbers of blades depending on
the head and water.
Fig7. Constructional Details of Bulb Turbine
Basic components of bulb turbine
- Stay cone
- Runner
chamber
- Draft tube
cone- stay cone
- Runner
chamber
- Draft tube
cone
- Generator
hatch
- Stay shield
- Rotating
parts
- Turbine
bearing
- Shaft seal
box
- Guide vane
mechanism
The power available from the
turbine at any particular instant is given by
Where,
Cd = Discharge Coefficient
A = Cross sectional area (m2)
G = gravity = 9.81
r = density
(kg/m3)
The discharge coefficient accounts for the
restrictive effect of the flow passage within the barrage on the passing water.
The
equation above illustrates how important the difference between the water
levels of the sea and the basin, (Z1-Z2), is when
calculating the power produced
TYPE 2ND: TIDAL CURRENT POWER
GENERATION
Advantages
of tidal current power generation Like the ocean dam models of France, Canada and Russia,
vertical and horizontal axis tidal current energy generators are fueled by the
renewable and free forces of the tides, and produce no pollution or greenhouse
gas emissions. As an improvement on ocean dam models, however, the new models
offer many additional advantages:- because the new tidal current models do not
require the construction of a dam, they are considered much less costly, they
are considered much more environmentally-friendly., further cost-reductions are
realized from not having to dredge a catchments area.- tidal current generators
are also considered more efficient because they can produce electricity while
tides are ebbing (going out) and surging (coming in),whereas barrage-style
structures only generate electricity while the tide is ebbing. Vertical-axis
tidal generators may be stacked and joined together in series to span a
passage of water such as a fiord and offer a transportation corridor (bridge),
essentially providing two infrastructure services for the price of one.
Vertical-axis tidal generators may be joined together in series to create
a ‘tidal fence’ capable of generating electricity.
Tidal
current energy, though intermittent, is predictable with exceptional accuracy
many years in advance. Present tidal current or tidal stream technologies are
capable of exploiting and generating renewable energy in many marine
environments that exist worldwide. It is proximal to existing, significant
electro transportation infrastructure - is blessed with exceptional
opportunities to generate large scale, renewable energy for domestic use and
export
TURBINES USED IN TIDAL CURRENT TYPE
POWER PLANT
Fig .8
Tidal Turbine
•
Vertical-axis tidal turbine– Canadian connection
A Canadian
company – Blue Energy Canada Inc. – has completed six successful prototypes of
its vertical-axis ‘Davis Hydro Turbine, named after its inventor, the late
Barry Davis. Barry Davis trained as an aerospace engineer, working on the
renowned Canadian Avro ‘Arrow’ project, then on the equally-remarkable ‘Bras
D’Or’ hydrofoil project of the Canadian Navy. Barry then decided to apply his
knowledge of hydrodynamics in creating a tidal energy generator. Barry received
support from the Canadian National Research Council and successfully tested 5
turbine prototypes in the St. Lawrence Seaway
and on the eastern seaboard. Blue Energy is presently raising funds for a
commercial demonstration project of the Davis Hydro Turbine.
Figure
9: cutaway graphic depicting an array of vertical-axis tidal turbines stacked
and joined in series across a marine passage.
Tidal currents push on vertical mounted hydrofoils that apply a torque
force to rotating shafts, which are coupled to generators housed just above the
water level. A transportation corridor (bridge, etc.) may be constructed along
the top surface providing two-for-one infrastructure service (courtesy, Blue
Energy Canada Inc.).
Figure 10: cutaway graphic of a ‘mid-range scale’ (2 x 250 kW)
vertical-axis tidal turbine. (Courtesy, Blue Energy Canada Inc.)
Trends in Generation Technologies:-
It has
been over 30 years since the world's largest tidal power station was
constructed on the Rance Estuary in France. At 240MW, it easily dwarves
the 18MW
Station at Annapolis Royal, Canada which was completed in 1984
and smaller, (less than 500 kW) systems in the Bay of Kislaya
and Janga Creek completed around the time of the La Rance project. Concerns
over the environmental effects of barrage tidal plants since the construction
of the La Rance tidal power station have lead to the development of
technologies which have less impact on the environment. Two key areas of
development have been in tidal fences and tidal turbines (also known as tidal
mills) Tidal Fences Tidal fences are composed of individual, vertical axis
turbines which are mounted within the fence structure, known as a caisson, and
they can be thought of as giant turn styles which completely block a channel,
forcing all of the water through them as shown in figure in operation.
Figure 11: Artists impression of a tidal fence
Unlike barrage
tidal power stations, tidal fences can also be used in unconfined basins, such
as in the channel between the mainland and a nearby off shore island, or
between two islands. As a result, tidal fences have much less impact on the
environment, as they do not require flooding of the basin and are significantly
cheaper to install. Tidal fences also have the advantage of being able to
generate electricity once the initial modules are installed, rather than after
complete installation as in the case of barrage technologies. Tidal fences are
not free of environmental and social concerns, as a caisson structure is still
required, which can disrupt the movement of large marine animals and shipping.
A 2.2GWp tidal fence using the Davis Turbine is being planned for the San
Bernadino Strait in the Philippines.
The project, estimated to cost $US 2.8 Billion and take 6 years to complete.
Tidal Turbines Proposed shortly after the oil crisis of the 1970s, tidal turbine s have only become reality in the
last five years, when a 15kW 'proof of concept' turbine was operated on Loch
Linnhe. Resembling a wind turbine, tidal turbines offer significant advantages
over barrage and fence tidal systems, including reduced environmental effects.
Figure12:
Schematic of an axial flow, seabed mounted marine current turbine
Tidal
turbines utilize tidal currents which are moving with velocities of between 2
and 3 m/s (4 to 6 knots) to generate between 4 and 13 kW/m2. Fast moving
current (>3 m/s) can cause undue stress on
he blades in a similar way that very strong gale force winds can damage
traditional wind turbine generators, whilst lower velocities are uneconomic.
Little research and development has been until taken until very recently in
this area, with only the small 3kW, Australian Tyson turbine, for river
systems, available commercially. Funding for a 300kW tidal turbine,
manufactured by IT Power Ltd has just been funded by the European Commission
and is expected to be installed during the year 2000.
CONSTRAINTS TO TIDAL POWER GENERATION
There are
also some significant environmental disadvantages which make tidal power,
particularly barrage systems less attractive than other forms of renewable
energy. Tidal Changes The construction of a tidal barrage in an estuary will
change the tidal level in the basin. This change is difficult to predict, and
can result in a lowering or rising of the tidal level. This change will also
have a marked effect on the sedimentation and turbidity of the water within the
basin. In addition, navigation and recreation can be affected as a result of a
sea depth change due to increased sedimentation within the basin. A rising of
the tidal level could result in the flooding of the shoreline, which could have
an effect on the local marine food chain.
Ecological Changes Potentially the
largest disadvantage of tidal power is the effect a tidal station has on the
plants and animals which live within the estuary. As very few tidal barrages have
been built, very little is understood about the full impact of tidal power
systems on the local environment. What has been concluded is that the effect
due to a tidal barrage is highly dependent upon the local geography and marine
ecosystem energy.
CASE STUDY
La Rance
Tidal Generation Plant the La Rance Tidal Generation Plant is currently the
world’s largest and oldest operational tidal power plant. Some brief historical
and background information about the plant will first be provided, followed by
the advantages and disadvantages of the plant. Background
Fig.13
La Rance Tidal Generation Plant
The La
Rance tidal power plant was initially designed in 1954, but construction was
not complete until 1967. This tidal power plant is so named because it sits on
the La Rance River, near St. Malo, on the Brittany coast in France. Although the La Rance plant
sits on a river, it has the same mannerisms as any other tidal power plant
located in the sea. The La Rance plant is located on the river close enough to
the sea for the river water to have tides similar to the sea tides. The
enclosed estuary of the La Rance has tidal range of up to 13.5 meters this
large tidal range provides a large hydrostatic head, which aids the plant’s
power production. The plant has 24 separate horizontal 10 MW turbines. The La
Rance plant utilizes double effect instead of single effect turbines. When all
turbines are functioning, the turbines provide an overall output of 240 MW of
power. This 240 MW is enough power to meet the electricity needs of about
300,000 homes (Banal 1981).
Figure
14: This shows the difference in sea
Levels at
high tide on the La Rance River (“The Rance Tidal Power Plant” 2002). Plant
Advantages and Disadvantages Many traits have allowed the La Rance plant to
successfully generate power over the past years. During the plant’s 30 years of
operation it has produced a total of 16 billion kWh and maintained an average
reliability of 90%. This reliability statistic means that at any given time,
only 10%, or roughly two of the 24 turbines will be inoperative. Turbine
efficiency is also an issue. Efficiency is the ratio of actual power output to
expected power output (Moran 2000). The operating turbines in the La Rance
power plant produce an output of 95% efficiency. While this efficiency
statistic seems good, it seems even better when compared to the efficiency of
traditional energy sources. Traditional coal burning technology operates at
about 35% efficiency (Shaw 1980).
Reliability
and efficiency are just a few of the many advantages from the La Rance tidal
plant. La Rance’s minimal impact on the environment also illustrates advantages
of tidal power. A tidal power station does not result in any chemical or
thermal pollution of the natural environment. Expected consequences from the
tidal plant stem from the obstacle that a tidal barrage creates. The La Rance
plant greatly impacted the environment only at initial construction. Marine
flora and fauna suffered as a result of human intervention in the environment.
The biological diversity in the basin recovered once the construction phase of
the plant ended.
The
flooding of the estuary is another environmental problem that can be caused
when building a tidal power plant. Although flooding of the estuary did not Happen
with the La Rance tidal power generation plant, flooding could be a major
Problem elsewhere. The La Rance bas in did not flood because the plant was
carefully planned and is always monitored to ensure that water levels in the
estuary do not become dangerously high. People do not inhabit the area around
the plant, so no homes were lost when the La Rance plant was created (Banal
1981). If people have environmental concerns about tidal power plants, they can
look to the La Rance tidal power generation plant and see that it is possible
to build an effective plant without destroying the plant’s surrounding
environment.
The 24 turbines
not only give the La Rance plant its plentiful power source, but also make it
possible to build a four-lane road on top of the tidal barrage. This barrage
reduced the distance from two neighboring cities from 45 km to 15 km. A bridge
averaging 26,000 vehicles per day now connects these cities, once separated by
the river, and traffic rises to around 50,000 vehicles per day during the
summer.
Research has
shown that building a bridge over a tidal power generation plant will ost little less than the initial construction
cost of the La Rance plant (Shaw 1980). If this is true, the La Rance plant
serves two purposes for the price of one. Now some of the disadvantages of La
Rance will be explored, although the disadvantages are minimal.
The
biggest disadvantage of the La Rance was the high initial cost of construction.
When built 1967, the plant cost 617 million francs, which is equivalent to 3.7
billion U.S. dollars today (Banal 1981). Although the initial cost is high, the
plant has been in operation over 30 years and maintenance costs are minimal.
Therefore, the plant has paid for itself over the years. Several different turbine
configurations are possible in tidal power plants. For example, the La Rance
uses a Bulb turbine .Water surrounds bulb
turbines, making access to the turbines difficult. The regular maintenance for
the turbines includes work on the turbines for 6 days every 4 years and 4 weeks
every 10 years. This sort of maintenance is typical for turbine operations.
Double effect bulb turbines are more difficult to maintain as a result of the
incoming and outgoing flow producing extra stress on the rotors. This extra stress
resulted in non-functional turbines, which led to losses in reliability. As a
result, La Rance does not generally run double effect because plant operators
found that running the turbines in single effect was more cost effective than
running double effect (Clark 1997). Thus,
double effects urbane are not necessarily the proper choice for every tidal
power generation plant.
PROBABLE SITES IN INDIA
1) Gulf of cambay: The range is 10.8m.Some of the sites on
western banks are Sonari & Bhavnagar creek & sites on eastern bank are
Dhodar &Kim river outfalls. His potential estimate is around 15MW. The
major problem is high sliy index 5000ppm causing erosion of barrage.
2) Gulf of Kutch: The maximum range is 7.5M. Lara creek
& Wank creek near Navlakhi are of attraction. Power potential is greater
than Cambay.Slit charge is much smaller than Cambay.
3) Sundarban
area in West Bengal: The tide range 4.8m.Power
of 40MW can be produced in this area.
ADVANTAGES
&DISADVANTAGES OF TIDAL POWER
PLANT
Advantages:
1)
Exploitation will in no case make demand for large area of valuable land,
because they are on bays.
2) It is
free from any pollution as it does not use any fuel.
3) It is
much more suitable than hydropower plant as it is independent of rain.
4) It is
independent on season cycle.
5) It has
unique capacity to meet the peak power demand effectively when it works in
combination with thermal or
hydroelectric.
Disadvantages:
1) Can
only be developed if natural sites are available.
2)
Transportation cost is more as sites are away from the load center.
3) The
navigation is obstructed.
4) The
output is varies with lunar cycle.
5) Capital
cost is considerably high.
6) Supply
is not continuous as it depends on timing of tides.
CONCLUSION
Advances
in tidal power technology have occurred in a relatively short amount of time,
and engineers have more incentive than ever to improve tidal power Generation.
When many engineers began experimenting with the idea of creating electricity
from the tides, tidal power was not taken seriously. Currently, the search for
renewable energy sources has become serious. More and more people are committed
to finding alternatives to the burning of natural resources because people
realize that soon enough, other power options must be explored. They see that
there is no reason to delay the switch
to another power source. Although another source of energy will be needed in
the future, tidal power will not be this source. Tidal power can help ease the
strain on other types of power production. The entire United States
could be powered by the tides; yet the cost is more than most people would be
willing to pay. So long as engineers have the ability to dream up new ideas and
constantly improve on them, humanity will have some sort of power source. Tidal
power has the potential to generate significant amounts of electricity at
certain sites around the world. Tidal power can be a valuable source of
renewable energy, although the United
States electricity needs could never be met
by tidal power alone. The negative impacts of tidal barrages are much smaller
than those of other sources of electricity; however this reason alone is not
enough to pursue implementation on a global scale. The technology required for
tidal power is well developed, and the main barrier to increase the use of
tides is that of construction cost. The prospect of natural resources and cost
of other forms of energy will ultimately decide the future of tidal power
generation.
